The Vaughan Law Firm PA is a public business in Charleston, SC. This law firm has been in business for six to nine years, has an annual revenue of $1 to 2.5 million, and employs four or more associates. They are ranked by Martindale-Hubbell and handle cases ranging from personal injury to business litigation. Below are some things to consider when choosing a law firm:
Martindale-Hubbell
The AV rating is one of the highest available from Martindale-Hubbell, the legal directory. This rating is only given to attorneys who have earned it through their high-quality work and ethical standards. Founded in 2007, the firm represents clients in the Low country on a variety of legal issues. Its practice areas include construction, business, estate planning, and personal injury. Attorneys at the firm are regularly recognized by their peers and clients, including a recent Super Lawyer Award
The Martindale-Hubbell client review ratings are based on a survey of actual clients. The ratings are used by individuals who have hired a particular lawyer, as well as by lawyers seeking referrals. The ratings have become so important to the legal community that 35% of people researching legal issues will hire an attorney in the near future based on the information they find on the Martindale-Hubbell website.
Martindale-Hubbell rating system
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings are used by individuals seeking legal advice and lawyers looking for referrals to other attorneys. Lawyers who have achieved Vaughan Law Firm an AV Preeminent rating are considered to be highly competent in their fields. The ratings are based on the opinions of their peers, and the firm strives to maintain the highest ethical standards. The ratings are published annually, and are based on the confidential opinions of the lawyers involved.
AV Ratings are based on peer reviews of attorneys, and have been used by attorneys for over eighty years. This rating system was developed by Martindale-Hubbell, the largest collection of confidential attorney reviews. Attorneys must have been admitted to the bar for three years before their rating is determined. However, it is not enough to have an AV rating to be a top-notch attorney.
High ethical standards
The law firm uses the Martindale-Hubbell rating system to evaluate its attorneys. Attorneys with an AV rating have demonstrated high ethical standards. Attorneys with an AV Preeminent rating are highly-respected by their peers. Attorneys who receive this rating are endorsed by their peers and are subject to an ongoing review process. A client’s review is an important part of evaluating a lawyer’s ability to serve as an attorney.
If you are looking for an estate planning Vaughan Law Firm PA lawyer, you’ve come to the right place. The Vaughan Law Firm, P.A., is located at 571 Folly Rd., Charleston, SC. Whether you need assistance with a will or a trust, they’ll be able to help you. The attorneys at Vaughan Law Firm are able to help you with both types of cases.
The AV rating is one of the highest available from Martindale-Hubbell, the legal directory. This rating is only given to attorneys who have earned it through their high-quality work and ethical standards. Founded in 2007, the firm represents clients in the Low country on a variety of legal issues. Its practice areas include construction, business, estate planning, and personal injury. Attorneys at the firm are regularly recognized by their peers and clients, including a recent Super Lawyer Award.
The Martindale-Hubbell client review ratings are based on a survey of actual clients. The ratings are used by individuals who have hired a particular lawyer, as well as by lawyers seeking referrals. The ratings have become so important to the legal community that 35% of people researching legal issues will hire an attorney in the near future based on the information they find on the Martindale-Hubbell website.
Conclusion
One of the most notable cases handled by the firm involved a homeowner who brought a claim against the Town of Lyman for failing to maintain sidewalks within the town’s jurisdiction. The Town responded by filing a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion, and Vaughan appealed. She argued that the court erred in granting Lyman summary judgment, and the court upheld part of the trial decision, while reversing the other portion.
